| Code | SI.POV.UMIC |
| Indicator Name | Poverty headcount ratio at $8.30 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population) |
| Short definition | Poverty headcount ratio at $8.30 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $8.30 a day at 2021 international prices. |
| Long definition | Poverty headcount ratio at $8.30 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $8.30 a day at 2021 international prices. |
| Source | World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income economies are mostly from the Luxembourg Income Study database. For more information and methodology, please see http://pip.worldbank.org. |
| Topic | Poverty: Poverty rates |
| Unit of measure | % |
| Periodicity | Annual |
| Aggregation method | Population-weighted average |
| Statistical concept and methodology | Poverty headcount ratio at $8.30 a day refers to the percentage of a population whose consumption or income per day falls short of $8.30 a day (adjusted for purchasing power parity differences across countries). $8.30 is the typical poverty line of upper-middle-income countries. |
| Development relevance | The World Bank defines a higher poverty line of $8.30, in addition to the international poverty line of $3.00, to account for higher living standards in a changing world (these values adjust for purchasing power differences across countries). The value of $8.30 is the typical poverty line of upper-middle-income countries, which is the estimated minimum amount of money people in upper-middle-income countries need to cover their daily basic needs, including food, clothing, shelter, heath care, education, and so on. The share of population living on less than $8.30 a day is the second indicator the World Bank tracks in its expanded vision indicators to create a world free of poverty in a livable planet. A growing majority of the world’s population live in middle-income countries (for example, about three-quarters in 2024 compared to one-quarter in 1990), so a higher poverty line would be more representative of the word’s current demographic structure. Further, a higher standard of poverty would be necessary to build resilience in a world more susceptible to climate-related risks. |
| Limitations and exceptions | Despite progress in the last decade, the challenges of measuring poverty remain. The timeliness, frequency, quality, and comparability of household surveys need to increase substantially, particularly in the poorest countries. The availability and quality of poverty monitoring data remains low in small states, countries with fragile situations, and low-income countries and even some middle-income countries. The low frequency and lack of comparability of the data available in some countries create uncertainty over the magnitude of poverty reduction.
Besides the frequency and timeliness of survey data, other data quality issues arise in measuring household living standards. The surveys ask detailed questions on sources of income and how it was spent, which must be carefully recorded by trained personnel. Income is generally more difficult to measure accurately, and consumption comes closer to the notion of living standards. And income can vary over time even if living standards do not. But consumption data are not always available: the latest estimates reported here use consumption data for about two-thirds of countries.
However, even similar surveys may not be strictly comparable because of differences in timing or in the quality and training of enumerators. Comparisons of countries at different levels of development also pose a potential problem because of differences in the relative importance of the consumption of nonmarket goods. The local market value of all consumption in kind (including own production, particularly important in underdeveloped rural economies) should be included in total consumption expenditure but may not be. Most survey data now include valuations for consumption or income from own production, but valuation methods vary. |
| General comments | The World Bank’s internationally comparable poverty monitoring database now draws on income or detailed consumption data from more than 2000 household surveys across 169 countries. See the Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP) for details (www.pip.worldbank.org). |
| Related source links | World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform: https://pip.worldbank.org/ |
| License URL | https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/public-licenses#cc-by |
| License Type | CC BY-4.0 |
| |