Country Policy and Institutional Assessment


Drag to rearrange the order



Separate thousands by commas

Format series



Title
Font Style Font Type
Font Color Font Size
Horizontal Alignment

Description
Font Style Font Type
Font Color Font Size
Horizontal Alignment
Apply Changes

Copy and paste this code to your website

Permanent link for this report

Share with your friends

Facebook Twitter Google +

Please log in to save your report


Share report
Snapshot Save


Clear Save
« »
» »
Preview
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high)3.03.03.03.53.53.53.53.53.53.5
CPIA business regulatory environment rating (1=low to 6=high)2.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.0
CPIA debt policy rating (1=low to 6=high)3.03.52.52.52.52.53.03.02.52.5
CPIA economic management cluster average (1=low to 6=high)3.23.33.03.03.03.03.03.03.03.0
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high)2.53.03.03.03.03.03.03.03.03.0
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)2.53.03.03.03.03.03.03.03.03.0
CPIA financial sector rating (1=low to 6=high)2.52.52.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0
CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high)3.03.03.03.03.03.02.52.53.03.0
CPIA gender equality rating (1=low to 6=high)2.02.02.02.02.01.51.51.51.51.5
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high)3.53.53.53.53.53.53.53.53.53.5
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average (1=low to 6=high)2.52.62.62.72.72.62.62.62.62.6
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)2.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.5
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high)1.51.51.51.51.51.51.51.52.02.0
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high)2.22.42.42.52.52.52.52.52.62.6
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high)3.03.53.53.53.53.53.53.53.53.5
CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high)2.02.02.02.52.52.52.52.52.52.5
CPIA social protection rating (1=low to 6=high)2.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.52.5
CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high)2.52.72.52.52.52.52.52.72.72.5
CPIA trade rating (1=low to 6=high)2.53.03.03.03.03.03.03.53.53.5
CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating (1=low to 6=high)2.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0
IDA resource allocation index (1=low to 6=high)2.62.82.62.72.72.72.72.72.72.7
Source: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment. Click on a metadata icon for original source information to be used for citation.
Selections have been modified. Click on "Apply Changes" at any time to refresh the report with the changes made. Otherwise, click on "Cancel" to go back to previous selections.
Cancel Apply Changes
Please log in to save

Kindly choose an option and press OK to continue

WB Staff Login Public Login


Close OK

Help/Feedback


Loading...